The diagnostic, weeks 1 to 8
The Compounding Workbook
Sample workbook. Every figure inside is illustrative, for a €100m culture-led brand. In a real engagement each one comes from your own invoices, interviews and survey.
Contents
- The answer, on one page
- How we got to these numbers
- 1Your ratio
- 1.1 Your initiatives
- 1.2 Rent or own
- 1.3 The ratio
- 1.4 Kept, and worth passing on
- 2What's in the way
- 2.1 The blocker scores
- 2.2 What we heard
- 3Where to start
- 3.1 Your moves, by floor
- 3.2 Candidates for your first owned format
- 3.3 Our recommended first format
- 3.4 The case for the tour, in numbers
- 4Recommended next steps
- AAppendix
- A1 The ledger
- A2 Interview guide
- A3 Team pulse survey
- A4 Data request
The answer, on one page
One euro in eight of last year's €6m built something you still use, and the same eighth gives people something to pass on. The rest was rent.
How we got to these numbers
Eight weeks, four workstreams, and four rules agreed with your finance team in week one. Every number in this workbook follows them.
- Spend
Twelve months of brand and marketing spend from your invoices, line by line.
Part 1 - Rent or own
Every line scored on five yes-or-no tests: what did it leave behind?
Worksheet 1.2 - People
Six leadership interviews and fourteen director surveys, scored against six blockers.
Part 2 - Model
What owning the tour would cost against rebuilding it, from real quotes.
Worksheet 3.4
- Real prices only. What rebuilding would cost comes from actual invoices or real quotes. Estimates are logged but never counted.
- A signed baseline. The baseline is the twelve months to [month, year]. What counts as kept is defined in Worksheet 1.2.
- Assets wear out. Every kept asset gets a useful life. Anything unused for two quarters, or past its life, is flagged and stops counting.
- Word of mouth is designed in, not measured by us. We judge each line's potential to be passed on (Worksheet 1.4) and use it to decide what to keep. Whether people actually pass it on is for your own brand research, or an independent agency, to read. It is never part of the saving.
Agreed with your finance team in week 1 and signed off by your CFO in week 8. The same rules run the ledger from here (A1).
Your initiatives
Every line of brand and marketing spend in the last twelve months, what it cost, and how it was measured.
| # | Initiative | Budget | Owner | How we measure it | What that told us |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Always-on paid social | €1,800k | Performance lead | ROAS, CPA | 3.4x ROAS in flight |
| 2 | Creative agency retainer | €900k | Brand director | Output delivered | On time, on brief |
| 3 | Festival sponsorships (3) | €600k | Partnerships | Reach, footfall | 1.1m reach |
| 4 | Summer pop-up tour (6 stops) | €740k | Events lead | Footfall, sales | 18k visitors |
| 5 | Ambassador programme | €710k | Brand lead | Posts, reach | 42 posts |
| 6 | Collaboration drops (3) | €500k | Product marketing | Sell-through | 92% sell-through |
| 7 | Documentary series | €450k | Content lead | Views | 1.4m views |
| 8 | DJ workshops | €300k | Community lead | Attendance | 2,100 attendees |
| Total | €6,000k | ||||
lines, €5.7m of the €6m, are judged only on what happened while the money was being spent: reach, ROAS, views, posts.
Only the DJ workshops are judged on whether people came back. None is judged on whether it gives people something to pass on.
Your reports can't tell money that built something from money that's gone. At budget time, the things worth keeping are the first to be cut.
Rent or own?
An initiative counts as owned if it leaves behind something measurable that the business keeps and can use again, judged by the rules agreed with your finance team (page 4). Five questions, yes or no.
- A
- Owned. Did it leave infrastructure we own?
- B
- Reusable. Could we use it again for less?
- C
- Lasting. Is it still working now the spend has stopped?
- D
- Learning stays. Did the know-how stay with us?
- E
- Hard to copy. Would a competitor struggle to buy it tomorrow?
| # | Initiative | A | B | C | D | E | Yes | Verdict | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Always-on paid social | 0 | Rent | Keep, but buy it on purpose | |||||
| 2 | Creative agency retainer | 1 | Rent | Bring the edit in-house | |||||
| 3 | Festival sponsorships (3) | 1 | Rent | Drop one, build your own | |||||
| 4 | Summer pop-up tour (6 stops) | 3 | Part-owned | Yes: the first format | |||||
| 5 | Ambassador programme | 3 | Part-owned | Own the content rights | |||||
| 6 | Collaboration drops (3) | 2 | Part-owned | Make it a programme | |||||
| 7 | Documentary series | 4 | Own | Bring the edit in-house | |||||
| 8 | DJ workshops | 4 | Own | Scale it |
4 or 5 yes is own. 2 or 3 is part-owned, usually the easiest place to gain. 0 or 1 is rent, which isn't a failure if you chose it on purpose.
The ratio
Last year's budget, added up by verdict.
| Verdict | Initiatives | Budget | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Own | 2 | €750k | 12.5% |
| Part-owned | 3 | €1,950k | 32.5% |
| Rent | 3 | €3,300k | 55.0% |
| Total | 8 | €6,000k | 100% |
The documentary. The DJ workshops. The summer tour. The same list, both times.
Two of three were right. The tour feels like an asset, but it's rebuilt by an agency every year, so nothing is kept.
(with word-of-mouth potential)25%
Kept, and worth passing on
A line of spend earns its place twice: once if you keep what it built, and again if people pass it on. Only two of your eight lines do both.
- ADid it leave infrastructure we own?
- BCould we use it again for less than it cost?
- CIs it still working now the spend has stopped?
- DDid the know-how stay with us, not the agency?
- EWould a competitor struggle to buy it tomorrow?
4 or 5 yes answers: kept.
- FDid it do something your key subcultures hadn't seen before?
- GCan people name it, and come back with a friend?
- HDoes it put the people those subcultures listen to at its centre: artists, hosts, makers?
2 or 3 yes answers: worth passing on.
| # | Initiative | Budget | Kept, of 5 | Passing on, of 3 | Where it sits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Documentary series | €450k | 4 | 3 | Both |
| 8 | DJ workshops | €300k | 4 | 2 | Both |
| 4 | Summer pop-up tour (6 stops) | €740k | 3 | 2 | Potential, not kept |
| 6 | Collaboration drops (3) | €500k | 2 | 2 | Potential, not kept |
| 5 | Ambassador programme | €710k | 3 | 1 | Neither |
| 3 | Festival sponsorships (3) | €600k | 1 | 0 | Neither |
| 2 | Creative agency retainer | €900k | 1 | 0 | Neither |
| 1 | Always-on paid social | €1,800k | 0 | 0 | Neither |
The blocker scores
Six statements, scored from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (painfully true). Six leaders scored them in interview, and fourteen directors in the team pulse survey.
- Leadership and directors agree: Measurement is the biggest blocker.
- Directors score Permission 1.2 points higher than leadership does.
- The people closest to the work feel the sign-off chain far more than the people at the top of it.
- Frame
- No shared view of what the brand stands for, or would never do.
- Permission
- Too many sign-offs between a good idea and a yes.
- Capability
- The know-how sits with agencies, not in the business.
- Measurement
- Reports only count what happens while the money is spent.
- Proof
- No example inside the business that it works here.
- Rituals
- Briefs, reviews and rewards that pull people back to the old way.
What we heard
Patterns from 20 conversations and the survey comments. Quotes are anonymised and stand for a view held by several people.
The documentary is the thing people mention most, but it's the hardest line to defend in the budget round.
"Everyone loves the series. Nobody can tell me what it's worth."
A tour stop needs five sign-offs, even when it repeats last year's plan. Lead time is eleven weeks.
"We re-approve the same thing every summer."
The agency holds the tour's build files, supplier list and venue contacts.
"If they walked, we'd start from zero."
Bonuses are set on in-quarter sales and reach. Nothing rewards an asset that pays back next year.
"Why would I build something someone else gets credit for?"
Your moves, by floor
Not every move needs you. Some are for the team and take weeks; a few need you and the board. The numbers show the order we'd go in: start small and cheap, prove it works, then go bigger.
Owned share, cost avoided and price held, read beside the P&L every quarter.
Removes: MeasurementNamed, not committed. Back on the table once core sales and profit targets are met.
ParkedOne team can run the tour without going up the chain for every stop.
Removes: Permission€200k from a logo on someone else's stage into the tour and the DJ workshops.
Removes: FrameBrief a second format built on the community you already have.
Removes: ProofSix stops, one build, a returning DJ roster. Worksheet 3.3 has the detail.
Removes: ProofOne editor and the agency's templates, so the know-how stays.
Removes: CapabilityFootage and build files stay with you from the next brief.
Removes: CapabilityGive every line of spend one number for what it is still doing once the money stops, such as return visits or repeat buyers.
Removes: MeasurementA repeatable format, such as a social series, built from footage you have already paid for.
Removes: ProofTen creators on the roster instead of 42 one-off posts.
Removes: RitualsWe only fill the floors your blockers point to. An empty floor is a finding too.
Candidates for your first owned format
Three things you already pay to rebuild every year that could be built once, owned and run again. Word-of-mouth potential is a gate: anything scoring under 3 isn't worth keeping, however much it saves.
| Candidate | Already spending | Repeatable | Credible in the scene | Savings potential | Team ready | Word-of-mouth potential | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summer pop-up tour | 25 | ||||||
| Collaboration programme | 23 | ||||||
| DJ workshops, scaled | 22 |
Our recommended first format
The summer pop-up tour, designed to be kept.
A named tour with fixed rules: six cities, one shared build, local DJs from the workshops at every stop. The same name to encourage WOM.
Kept: the rightsNext: license the tour to a partner city or brand.The DJs and creators from the workshops, booked as a returning roster.
Kept: the relationshipsNext: a ready roster for every future stop.Build files, suppliers and the run-of-show brought in-house from the agency.
Kept: the capabilityNext: run a second format without an agency.Sign-ups at every stop, so people can be invited back next year, and bring someone.
Kept: the communityNext: build CRM, sell directly, ticket future stops.Footage and stories from every stop, cleared for reuse across channels.
Kept: the libraryNext: a year-round content library for every channel.Events lead, reporting to the CMO
End of year one, at stop 6. Every stop after that costs less than rebuilding
Cost per stop not falling by stop 6, or sign-ups under 3,000
The case for the tour, in numbers
Keeping the tour costs the same as rebuilding it in year one, breaks even at stop 6, and runs about 60% cheaper from year two. €1.46m saved over four years.
| Rebuilt | Kept | Saving | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | €740k | €740k | €0 |
| Year 2 | €740k | €296k | €444k |
| Year 3 | €740k | €247k | €493k |
| Year 4 | €740k | €222k | €518k |
| Four years | €2.96m | €1.5m | €1.46m |
Assumptions: six stops a year, €740k when rebuilt, from last year's invoices. Kept: the same €740k in year one to own the build and bring the files in-house, then €296k in year two, falling as the team learns. Income from sponsors or tickets is not counted, and nor is word of mouth: it is designed into the format (3.3), not measured by us. Year one is about savings.
Recommended next steps
The first 90 days end with the first format ready to run and measured from day one.
| When | What | Who | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Sign off the baseline and the rules on page 4, first agreed in week 1. The diagnostic closes on numbers finance stands behind | CFO | |
| Week 9 | Decide: build with Hella, build it yourselves, or pause | CEO, CMO | |
| Week 9 | Name the tour lead and give them the decision rights (move 5 on page 11) | CMO | |
| Week 9 | Add a rights clause to the agency contract before the next brief | CMO | |
| Week 10 | Bring the tour build files, suppliers and contacts in-house | Events lead | |
| Week 10 | Set up the ledger and log the tour as the first owned asset | Finance partner | |
| Week 10 | Give every line of spend a measure of what lasts after the money stops | Finance partner | |
| Week 11 | Agree stop dates, the returning DJ roster and the tour's permanent name | Tour lead | |
| Week 11 | Secure the rights to all of the archive footage. Lock the ambassador roster for the year | Content and brand leads | |
| Week 12 | Plan stop one. First ledger reading booked for the end of the quarter | Tour lead, Hella |
- What's one asset we could build this year that we'd still be using in three years, and that people would tell a friend about?
- Which blocker, if removed, would free the most budget to move from rent to own?
- What would finance need to see, at the first ledger reading, to back the next format?
Appendix
How we got here, and the tools that keep score from here.
- A1 The ledger
- A2 Leadership interview guide
- A3 Team pulse survey
- A4 Data request
The ledger
The diagnostic baseline was a one-off snapshot of your whole marketing budget. The ledger keeps score from here: set up in week 10, it covers the whole marketing function, starts with the tour as its first owned asset, and is read against the baseline every quarter.
| Tab | What goes in | Who updates it |
|---|---|---|
| Settings | Baseline, revenue, the rules on page 4 | Finance partner, once |
| Owned assets | Every asset you build: first cost, useful life | Format lead |
| Reuse log | Every time an asset is used again, and what renting it would have cost | Format lead |
| Earnings log | Anything others pay for an asset. Usually empty in year one | Format lead |
| Rented spend | Media, agency fees, sponsorships, and what each left behind | Finance partner |
| Value built | Price premium, branded acquisition cost, time from idea to yes | Finance partner, quarterly |
| Date | Asset | Use | Cost of use | Cost to rent | Price from | Saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Date] | Summer tour build | Stop 2 | €49,000 | €123,000 | Invoice | €74,000 |
Leadership interview guide
45 minutes, one to one, confidential. Each answer is scored against the six blockers straight after the conversation.
- What would this brand never do?
- When did someone last make a call because they knew what the brand stood for?
- Walk me through the last idea that went from you to live. How many sign-offs?
- Which decisions could your team make that currently go up?
- What do your agencies know that you don't?
- If your biggest agency left tomorrow, what would you lose?
- What work do you believe in but struggle to defend at budget time?
- Where has paid spend proved most valuable?
- What of ours do people tell their friends about, and why that one?
- Has long-term brand work ever visibly paid off here? What happened?
- What gets people promoted in marketing here?
- What does a post-mortem look like, if there is one?
Team pulse survey
Sent to directors and heads of brand, marketing, creative and partnerships. Ten minutes, anonymous. The same six statements as the leadership interviews, so the two can be compared.
| Statement | 1 not true, 5 painfully true | One example from the last year | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame | If you asked five senior people what our brand would never do, you'd get five different answers. | 12345 | |
| Permission | Brand decisions the team could make themselves usually go up the chain for sign-off. | 12345 | |
| Capability | Our agencies know how to make our brand work better than we do. | 12345 | |
| Measurement | Work that builds long-term value is hard to defend in budget reviews, because our reports don't show it. | 12345 | |
| Proof | People here agree with long-term brand investment in principle, but nobody has seen it pay off here. | 12345 | |
| Rituals | Our briefs, reviews and promotion criteria reward short-term results over things that last. | 12345 |
If you could change one thing about how brand work gets approved here, what would it be?
Data request
What we asked for in week one. Ticked items were received.
- Twelve months of brand and marketing spend, by lineFinance export by supplier and category is enough to start
- Agency contracts and feesIncluding who owns the files and rights
- Any events, content or formats you already runEven informal ones
- Brand tracking or pricing dataIf you have it
- Org chart for brand, marketing and partnershipsFor the interview and survey list
- Approval process for a typical activationWho signs, in what order